Activists Demand US$5 Trillion in Real Climate Finance

Chanting for Change at COP29: 

WHAT: Civil society organizations at COP29 will unite in a powerful, synchronized protest demanding that the Global North finally pay up its climate debt to the Global South with $5 trillion in real climate finance. Activists are calling for public finance that is predictable, non-debt-creating, new and additional. Two groups, occupying two different locations, will chant in perfect synchrony as speakers address COP29 visitors, making their voices heard. Their rhythm and resolve will echo through the Blue Zone, carrying a message of climate justice for all.

WHEN: Friday, November 15, 2024, 10:30am Baku time (UTC+4)

WHERE: Action Location 2 and Action Location 4, Zone B, COP29 Blue Zone

WHO: The following civil society groups at COP29 will be taking part:

  1. Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice – action location 4
  2. Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development – action location 4
  3. Organizations from Trade Union Non-Governmental Organizations (TUNGO) – action location 4
  4. Climate Action Network International – action location 2
  5. Organizations from the Women and Gender Constituency – action location 2
  6. Organizations from Indigenous Peoples Organizations (IPO) – action location 2

MEDIA CONTACTS:

Isabel Rodrigo | Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development | +63 926 734 5712 | [email protected]

Julian Reingold | Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice | +306941437285 | [email protected]

Attila Kulcsár | Climate Action Network International | +44 7472 124872 | [email protected]

Funding climate action in the food and agriculture sector through just transitions

DCJ PRESS RELEASE:  

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 14 NOV 24 – As COP29 heads into the fourth day, climate finance for ambitious climate action in the food and agriculture sector needs to be an urgent demand within the global climate policy space. Agriculture is both a significant contributor to climate change, responsible for 21-37% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and a sector highly vulnerable to its impacts.

About 15% of global fossil fuel resources are destined to agriculture and food transport & storage. Agriculture lacks robust emissions reduction targets, with increasing dependence on petrochemical-based pesticides and fertilisers. A quick and just transition in agriculture is urgently needed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, given that 80% of the world’s poorest live in rural areas and rely on this sector for their livelihoods. Needless to say that women represent 43% of the agricultural workforce. 

Empowering small food producers in agriculture enhances sustainability, resilience, and food security, yet climate finance for small-scale farmers remains limited, with only 0.8% allocated to these groups in 2023. Food systems should focus on producing adequate, nutritious, and accessible food for all, with an emphasis on meeting communities’ staple needs for domestic consumption.

“A just transition is not only switching from coal to renewable energy. A just transition recognizes the self-determination of farmers, communities, small producers and asking them what they want to grow.”

Wanun Permpibul, Climate Watch Thailand

“No climate action will be successful if we do not include a radical transformation of agri-food systems, and to achieve that we need women. For that we need adequate financing and to highlight their role in the agri-food system from seed to plate.”

Andrea Echeverri, Global Forest Coalition 

“Just transitions cannot be reduced to fossil fuels and workers, it has to be about the whole of society’s transformation that undoes centuries of historical inequality and addresses not only the climate crisis but also the biodiversity crisis as well. We need an expansive vision of transformation that delivers a just and ecological equitable transition.”

Leon Sealy-Hoggins, War on Want

“A just transition in the energy sector will not be possible without a just transition away from the industrial agriculture model that accounts for 15% of all fossil fuel annually. A just transition away from industrial agriculture towards an equitable, humane and sustainable food system is urgently needed to meet the climate, biodiversity and sustainable development targets.”

Elodie Guillon, World Animal Protection 

‘The stakes couldn’t be higher. The food and agriculture sector is the 2nd largest emitting sector after energy whilst at the same time already bearing the brunt of climate changes which billion of poor rely on. Without urgent action and a just transition away from the industrial animal agriculture system towards equitable, humane and sustainable food system the climate, biodiversity and the SDG goals will remain out of reach.’

Cross Constituency Intervention: 3rd CG Meeting of the JTWP

Thank you Chair for the Floor, we the TUNGO constituency would like to deliver this statement on behalf of ourselves, Women and Gender, Climate Action Network and Demand Climate Justice and YOUNGO. 

As the allied civil society constituencies, we have consistently advocated that the Just Transition Work Programme be a space for transformative action for workers in formal and informal economy, people and the planet. We are afraid that the current draft text pulls us into a deadlock with the only outcome being another dialogue. We would like to reiterate that the JTWP must move beyond only dialogues and must deliver just transition on the ground and for that we need the WP to focus on concrete actionable outcomes in achieving the elements (a) to (g) outlined in paragraph 2 of decision 3/CMA.5

As allied constituencies, we would like to ask Parties to consider an  alternative to paragraph 6 of the draft text:

“Invites Parties, observers, and other non-Party stakeholders to submit via the submission portal views on concrete outcomes to achieving the elements (a) to (g) listed in paragraph 2 of decision 3/CMA.5 by February and requests the co-chairs to draft a compilation of the submissions to be used for the third and fourth dialogue.”

The purpose of this alternative is to focus all our work in 2025 on concrete outcomes, instead of sectoral dialogues. 

All constituencies have also other inputs on the text and would welcome the possibility to come back on those later. At this stage we consider it crucial to ensure the text offers at least one avenue to making a difference for people on the ground as soon as possible. 

The time is now.

Interventions: Opening plenary

My name is Erica Njuguna from Alliance of Non-Governmental Radical Youth speaking on behalf of ENGO-DCJ. I voluntarily disclose that I have no direct ties to the fossil fuel industry (or other emissions intensive industries) and no conflicts of interest. 


I sit here before you because my country is being hit by severe droughts, and we demand reparations. I was only 7 years old when the largest historical polluter parachuted into Copenhagen with a big figure that awed everyone…$100 billion sounded like a lot then. 

But, by all HONEST accounts, it has NOT been delivered, and NOW the needs have ballooned due to the Global North’s failing to go first and fastest in phasing out fossil fuels, while refusing to provide Global South countries sufficient support through finance and technology.

NCQG must make up not only for lost time but also the loss and damage resulting from delay.

A survey of needs-based analyses informs DCJ’s demand for the Global North to PAY UP $5 trillion in public funding for climate debt AND as a quantum. 

It is not lack of finance but misplaced priorities. We know the money is there! We all see the trillions being spent on weapons of war and fossil fuel subsidies, currently converging as forces of genocide in Gaza, Lebanon, Sudan, Congo. 

Yet we will NOT be fooled by Article 6’s carbon markets being presented as climate finance that will further harm communities in the Global South, violate the inherent rights of Indigenous Peoples’, and fail to deliver urgent emissions cuts.

Carbon markets under Article 6 are illegitimate, and A6 will flood the system with pollution permits undermining the Paris Agreement. Environmental and human rights defenders are being killed while your carbon markets that jeopardize Indigenous Peoples’ rights, the human rights of local communities, and the territorial integrity of Mother Earth are pushed through.

All of these dynamics make the modalities of the UAE Dialogue imperative to focus on finance and not be diluted to cover everything and thus nothing. We need accountability for finance if we want more mitigation, adaptation and responsibility for loss and damage. Defund genocide, fund climate justice NOW!

Undemocratic gavelling through of carbon markets as COP29 opens

PRESS RELEASE: 

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 13 NOV 24 – The opening day of COP29 saw the undemocratic gavelling through of carbon markets, once again enshrining the interests of Big Polluters over people. Carbon markets are not climate finance; they are a gift to the fossil fuel industry to continue polluting while leaving the door wide open for rampant proliferation of dangerous and unscientific false solutions such as geoengineering, ‘offsetting’ and carbon capture. 

Rich countries and big polluting industries continue to funnel money in to wars, genocide and “fixes” that will allow them to keep their extractive economic systems going without delivering on the urgent climate finance for the Global South countries. These schemes only perpetuate neocolonial patterns of extractivism, with Global South and Indigenous communities first and foremost impacted.  

Members of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice put the spotlight on the polluters’ attempt to derail climate action. 

“Full operationalisation of carbon markets was approved on the first day of COP29, sending a disappointing message to the world, with lack of democratic process enabling parties to discuss. Indigenous Peoples and communities in the South will not be the ones celebrating this event – it will be the Big Polluters and rich countries, the same ones who spend billions in genocide and false solutions instead of the climate finance needed for a Just Transition and Loss and Damage in the Global South. Carbon markets are not climate finance – this is a lie, this is a false solution. This will not support the real solutions from communities in the South, the real proven cost effective community centred solutions are being increasingly swept aside in favour of these business driven schemes. 

COP16 in Cali took place a few weeks ago – we have pushed for the confluence of biodiversity and climate agendas for years, but the way it is now happening is only in favour of big polluters. We are seeing the same false solutions, at the profit of industries and at the expense of communities. Only the last 2 days of COP16 were given to the discussions of finance – the GN continues to evade responsibility for their climate debt.”

Tatiana Rodríguez Maldonado,  CENSAT Agua Viva / Friends of the Earth Colombia

“We work for the inherent and collective rights of IP and the dignity of IP throughout the world. The unprecedented bypass of procedure in this COP29 demonstrates a desperate attempt to rush more carbon markets, offsets, removals that have resulted in IP rights violation, land grabs, and human impacts. Climate change cannot be changed from a system that facilitates growth and the profit of corporations. These false solutions do not cut carbon emissions at source, they will continue to profit the world’s largest polluters whilst continuing to sidetrack the much needed emission reductions. We don’t want to see this as the continuation of colonisation towards a termination agenda of IP rights. Mother Earth is not a commodity, she is not for sale.”

Tom Goldtooth, Indigenous Environmental Network

“We must call out these FS wherever they show up. One of them is CCS, there is no evidence that CCS can work, yet the rush for financing these technologies continues. These inequitable solutions like CCS and geoengineering exclude the leadership of young people especially those on the frontlines of climate change, facing the worst impacts. We must not allow genuine measures like climate finance to be co-opted by these schemes. There will not be a magical technological solution that means we can continue business as usual.”

Dylan Hamilton, Alliance of Non-Governmental Radical Youth

“I often get asked – how do you spot false solutions? There are so many benchmarks. Here is one simple example: for the last decades carbon markets have been pushed and rolled out, has there been any real and lasting emission reductions? No? Then why do we gavel them through on the first day of COP? There is a very simple way to spot false solutions, and that is to trace any scheme or proposal to its source. Spoiler alert, if those that are pushing these schemes are the same actors that have been fueling climate change whilst knowing for half a century of the harm it would cause, then these so-called solutions are not solutions. These BigPolluters are only about one thing – protecting their own profit. This is why they think nothing of continuing to fuel a genocide, or violating Indigenous Peoples rights. 

Yet it doesn’t have to be this way – there are real, proven, cost effective solutions that respect communities rights and the world we live in. We must look beyond these halls, reject these dangerous distractions, and finally and urgently embrace real solutions.”

Rachel Rose Jackson, Corporate Accountability, member of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice

Contact Us

Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]

False Solutions and deceptive victories on the rise: Carbon markets are not climate finance!

MEDIA ADVISORY: Nov 13th, 2024

COP29 Press Conference – The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ) 

The opening day of COP29 saw the undemocratic gavelling through of carbon markets, once again enshrining the interests of Big Polluters over people. Carbon markets are not climate finance; they are a gift to the fossil fuel industry to continue polluting while leaving the door wide open for rampant proliferation of dangerous and unscientific false solutions such as geoengineering, ‘offsetting’ and carbon capture. 

Rich countries and big polluting industries continue to funnel money in to wars, genocide and “fixes” that will allow them to keep their extractive economic systems going without delivering on the urgent climate finance for the Global South countries. These schemes only perpetuate neocolonial patterns of extractivism, with Global South and Indigenous communities first and foremost impacted.  

Join us as members of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice spotlight the polluters’ attempt to derail climate action. 


When: Wednesday 13th November | 12:30pm-1:00pm (Baku)

Where: Press Conference – Natavan, Area D / WATCH LIVE

Who:

  • Tatiana Rodríguez Maldonado,  CENSAT Agua Viva / Friends of the Earth Colombia
  • Tom Goldtooth, Indigenous Environment Network
  • Dylan Hamilton, Alliance of Non-Governmental Radical Youth
  • Rachel Rose Jackson, Corporate Accountability

Contact Us

Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]

Money for war but not for climate in Baku

PRESS RELEASE:

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 12 NOV 24 – As the genocide continues to unfold in Gaza, leaders around the world are arriving in Baku for the World Leader’s Summit on day two of COP29. Widely dubbed as the “Finance COP”, climate justice leaders from the Global South are demanding a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) of U$5 trillion, with “quality” finance provided by grants from public funds, not loans from private investors. 

Decades of inaction and broken promises have not only compounded today’s climate impacts but have also deepened the extreme inequalities and injustices endured by communities, economies, and ecosystems. Yet Global North governments are about to increase their spending on weapons of war while ignoring how climate impacts are intensifying insecurity and displacement driving conflict. 

“The Philippines is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change: we have been recently hit by a typhoon, the situation keeps getting worse year after year and people’s lives are being lost.

For the last  two decades, almost since Bali 2007, climate finance was identified as a key element within the negotiations, since without it we cannot achieve climate action and just transition. During the 2009 summit in Copenhagen, the offer by the US was 100 billion, such a pittance. 15 years have gone by, and all we get is more delays. Year after year, we hear the same argument: “there’s not enough public money”, but there’s more than enough that cannot be mobilized due to the lack of political will. Using public money means making the private sector involved with climate action, hence expanding the contributor base. We have been paying for our own climate action for a long time: 85% of what we spend comes from our own pockets. The Global North owes us at least 5 trillion per year. Even if they disburse quickly, there are very little funds. We need to put decision-making at a global level.”

Lidy Nacpil, Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development

“This Finance COP is not on track to deliver what the Global South needs. Carbon Markets stand with Article 6 and they will be presented as climate finance, but that is not climate finance. What is finance in terms of quantity and quality? We need to figure out how to get our Global North govs to pay up”.

Victor Menotti, Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice

“They’re destroying our future, and climate finance is turning victims into debtors. Providing charity doesn’t exonerate them from historical responsibility as geopolitical powers. The Loss and Damage fund is not built to protect human rights, but to foster profit. The climate finance mechanisms have to be built from the ground.”

Adrian Martinez, La Ruta Del Clima 

“After decades of broken promises, COP29 must mark a turning point for rich countries to meet their legal and moral obligation to pay up to address climate impacts and ensure a fair fossil fuel phase out. There is no shortage of public money to do this, what is lacking is political courage. Rich countries can raise well over $5 trillion every year by ending fossil fuel handouts, making big polluters pay, taxing the super rich, and changing unfair global financial rules that exacerbate Global South debt and don’t see the money go where it’s most needed. Pursuing these measures will benefit all of us. We are tired of excuses. In Canada, there is always more public money for the tar sands and billionaire tax breaks, but never enough for what communities need.” 

Bronwen Tucker, Oil Change International 

Contact Us

Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]

Money for war but not for climate action in Baku

MEDIA ADVISORY

Press Conference – The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ) 

As the genocide continues to unfold in Gaza, leaders around the world are arriving in Baku for the World Leaders’ Summit on day two of COP29 to discuss the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance. Widely dubbed as the “Finance COP”, climate justice movement from the Global South has raised a demand of $5 trillion per year, with “quality” finance provided by grants from public funds, not loans from private investors. 

Decades of inaction and broken promises by the rich countries, while shifting burden and blame on developing countries have not only compounded today’s climate impacts but have also deepened the extreme inequalities and injustices endured by communities, economies, and ecosystems, especially in the Global South. Yet Global North governments keep increasing their spending on weapons of war while ignoring climate impacts are intensifying insecurity and displacement, driving conflict. 

Join us as members of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice point to trillions of dollars being blown on military spending and fossil fuel subsidies, but is nowhere to be seen in Baku.

When: Tuesday, 12 November | 10:30am (Baku) 

Where: Press Conference – Natavan, Area D / WATCH LIVE

Who:

Contact Us Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]

Climate justice groups condemn COP29’s carbon markets decision setting the tone for corporate profits to prevail people’s interests


PRESS RELEASE

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 11 NOV 24 – As the global community gathers for the start of COP29, climate justice groups deplore the gaveling through of harmful carbon markets on the first day of the conference. This is not only an undemocratic process that threatens the credibility of this conference, it sets the tone for this COP to put Big Polluters’ profits above people’s rights.

The failure of voluntary carbon markets have shown that carbon markets, offsets, and removals do not work. Instead, they provide a smokescreen for big polluters to keep on emitting at the expense of people and nature. Time and again, these neocolonial schemes have resulted in land grabs, Indigenous Peoples rights and human rights violations, and the undermining of food sovereignty. 

Fully operationalizing carbon markets on the first day of COP29 sends an appalling message to the world for a COP that is set to see the delivery of urgently needed climate finance: Big Polluters and Global North governments may celebrate this as a success, and many will argue that carbon markets can provide the finance needed for a just energy transition, adaptation, and loss and damage in the global South. 

But carbon markets only fill the pockets of Big Polluters, they cannot – and will not – deliver the climate finance needed and owed to developing countries. The gavelling through of this decision on the first day of COP29 sets a dangerous precedent. The documents from the Supervisory Body must go through the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA) for all parties to negotiate on. The rushing through of this decision is undemocratic and undermines the whole process.

Real, proven, community-centered and cost-effective solutions to justly address the climate crisis are increasingly being swept aside in favor of these industry-basked, risky, expensive, and harm-inducing false solutions. Climate justice begins with ending financing for and promotion of false solutions, instead, this COP must deliver the urgently needed climate finance owed to the global South. Bulldozing through Article 6.4 on the first day of the COP without any discussions and opportunity to negotiate by the Parties undermines the CMA, the COP and subverts the entire UNFCCC COP process. 

“Bulldozing through the Carbon Market methodology and text on the first day of the COP without any discussions and opportunity to negotiate by the Parties undermines the CMA, the COP and subverts the entire UNFCCC COP process. The arrival of the carbon market through the backdoor is a bad beginning for this COP, the global south, the Indigenous Peoples, forest and the front line communities. A global mobilization against the carbon markets is the need of the hour now.”

Souparna Lahiri, Senior Climate and Biodiversity Policy Advisor, Global Forest Coalition

“Carbon markets put Indigenous Peoples’ lives at risk. For over 20 years, these fraudulent mechanisms have allowed fossil fuel industries to continue with impunity. At this COP 29, the corporate capture has superseded any semblance of UN democracy with a move from the COP Presidency to go rogue and push through Article 6 carbon market methodology and removals texts without following party-driven procedure. IEN strongly opposes geoengineering technologies in the activities on removals text, which still has not produced a list of what removals technologies will even be included in A6.4 as an offset. We will continue to voice our opposition against Article 6 carbon markets.

Tom Goldtooth, Executive Director of the Indigenous Environmental Network. 

“The gavelling through of carbon markets on the first day of COP29 is unacceptable and undermines the credibility of the whole process. Further, it is opening the floodgates for a global carbon market that will have devastating impacts on communities in the Global South, on Indigenous Peoples, and on small peasant farmers first and foremost. Carbon markets are not climate finance, and we cannot accept these neocolonial schemes to be propped as a success of COP29 in lieu of paying the climate debt owed to the Global South.” 

Lise Masson, Friends of the Earth International.

“Carbon markets are not climate finance. They are not the meaningful Real Zero action we desperately need while the world reaches record-breaking temperatures. They are a get-out-of-jail-free card for the world’s Big Polluters and Global North governments. And they condemn people and the planet. For this COP to claim victory, it must reject these false solutions that have been found to be essentially junk time and time again.  It just delivers the Global North’s climate debt and fair share of climate action. And it must defund genocide and finally kick Big Polluters out.” 

Rachel Rose Jackson, Director of Climate Research and Policy, Corporate Accountability.

“This is a bad process and a worse outcome. By trying to ram through loose standards for dangerous carbon crediting mechanisms behind closed doors, the Supervisory Board is handing Big Oil a gift and setting course for climate disaster. Under these sham guidelines, speculative so-called ‘carbon removal’ technologies and ‘carbon capture’ schemes led by oil and gas companies could be counted as carbon offsets – even if they increase climate pollution. Up to 79% of current ‘carbon capture’ operating capacity is just used to produce more fossil fuels, and these guidelines open the door for even more public money for polluting industries. Governments have already spent over USD 25 billion of public money on carbon capture and are planning to spend up to USD 240 billion more, but currently operating carbon capture projects have captured almost no emissions. This dodgy deal shows the Supervisory Board is more interested in looking like they are acting on climate change than actually acting on climate change – UN states should reject it immediately.” 

Myriam Douo, Oil Change International.

“The approval of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement represents a violation of human rights and the original rights of Indigenous peoples. Turning environmental protection and biodiversity into a commodity ignores the sacred value that these beings represent for Indigenous communities. They want to convince us that they can save the planet by selling our forests and the life that lives in them, but this is just another business tactic that only benefits big polluters. Instead of protecting, this policy puts our natural resources at risk and offends the principles of respect and harmony with nature. An approach that truly considers the genuine preservation and dignity of traditional peoples is urgently needed.The real solution for the climate is in the hands of the Indigenous peoples, who have been protecting the earth for millennia with their knowledge and their struggle.” Cacique Ninawa Huni Kui, Federation of Huni Kui People of the State of Acre Coordinator – Amazon, Brazil

“It is a very bad signal to open this finance COP by legitimizing carbon markets as a solution to climate change. They’re not – they will increase inequalities, infringe on human rights, and hinder real climate action. In adopting Article 6, the COP presidency is setting the tone for the remainder of the climate talks and confusing ‘climate finance’ with ‘markets’. COP29 is and should remain a finance COP, not a “markets” COP. Countries affected by climate change desperately need real money. The real win for this COP will be in securing 1 trillion a year in grants, not bonds, nor fake offset mechanisms that are a thinly veiled excuse for the world’s biggest polluters to pretend they’re paying their share. Dangerous distractions masquerading as emissions reductions will not suffice. We are here in Baku to demand a new, real climate finance goal, and we won’t accept schemes that only serve to pad the pockets of climate culprits.” 

Ilan Zugman, 350.org Latin America and Caribbean Director says:

“Carbon markets are not a solution to the climate crisis, and by pushing them through at this COP Indigenous People and those in the Global South are being further condemned by the Global North to suffer catastrophic consequences. At best, it is an insult to the legitimacy of the COP processes, and at worst it is a gift to the fossil fuel industry to continue to pollute unimpeded. Carbon markets are not climate finance, with this agreement in particular riddled with loopholes and false solutions that enable big polluters. This decision is putting the entire aim of the Paris Agreement at risk.” Dylan Hamilton, Alliance of Non-Governmental Radical Youth (ANGRY).

“The Africa Make Big Polluters Coalition urgently demands that COP29 unequivocally reject false solutions like carbon markets. These markets are not merely a deceptive substitute for genuine climate finance; they allow polluters to commodify our planet’s future while continuing to pollute our environment. As we gather to confront the climate crisis, we must remember: you can’t buy air from one part of the world to another, and that is precisely what carbon markets represent—another false solution threatening the very existence of our planet.This deception comes at an unbearable cost to thousands of frontline and grassroots communities who have lost their land, livelihoods, families, and lives due to these harmful carbon market projects. We must stand united and demand real, impactful solutions that prioritize the health of our planet and its people. Governments at COP29 must reject carbon markets and commit to meaningful climate action without delay. Big polluters must be held accountable for their undeniable contribution to this climate crisis—the time for action is now!”
Akinbode Oluwafemi, Executive Director , Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa

“Apart from undermining established procedures, a big source of frustration for us is the fact that false ‘solutions’ like removals are still on the table. History tells us that these mechanisms distract from real and lasting emission cuts and have adverse impacts on the rights and livelihoods of communities worldwide. They drive land dispossession, undermine food sovereignty, erode democratic control over resources, privatise global commons, exploit labour, and intensify the most destructive elements of the capitalist system.

We have been very categorical: any mechanism premised on allowing polluters to continue business as usual, to justify fossil fuel use, or to persist in colonising and plundering the global South is not a solution.”

Jax Bongon, IBON International

“For more than two decades of operation, carbon markets have proven to be a completely useless mechanism for reducing emissions, a source of shady business that has only served large emitters to evade their responsibility and deepen the climate crisis by promoting projects that generate impacts and violate the rights of communities.”

Eduardo Giesen, Regional Coordinator DCJ Latin America and the Caribbean. 

“Today, States allowed this rogue move from the Supervisory Body to prevail in the quest to start COP29 with a “win.” But this is hardly a win for people or planet.  Approving this without discussion or debate on this approach, sets a dangerous precedent for the entire negotiation process. This is very concerning from a procedural standpoint: it bypasses States’ ability to even discuss , much less revise the standards before they go into effect. States’ oversight is all the more critical as the Supervisory Body’s efforts to get this done has resulted in risky rules that will lead to human rights violations and environmental harm.  While States won’t be able to undo this move, they can still partially correct the wrong by giving strong guidance to the Supervisory Body that ensures further rules are adopted in line with science, human rights, and international law.”
Erika Lennon, Senior Attorney, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)  

“As the last decades have shown, carbon markets are not only a false solution to the climate crisis but also perpetuate the extractive colonial model of development and human rights violations. The text on removals as it is now, opens the floodgates to very harmful activities like geoengineering which will only worsen the climate crisis and divert attention from real solutions. Today, COP29 has had a very bad start and sets an appalling precedent from a procedural point of view, but above all, it has taken yet another step on the road to climate disaster by backing false solutions and the interest of a few to the detriment of the planet and peoples.”
Coraina de la Plaza, Global Coordinator, Hands Off Mother Earth! (HOME) Alliance

“This is not a success for COP 29, this is a climate and development disaster. Carbon markets are pollution permits allowing wealthy nations and companies to emit CO2 at will, funding neocolonial projects that exclude people and do little for the climate.”

Alison Doig, Recourse

Contact Us

Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]

Climate justice groups condemn COP29’s carbon markets decision setting the tone for corporate profits to prevail people’s interests

PRESS RELEASE:

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN, 11 NOV 24 – As the global community gathers for the start of COP29, climate justice groups deplore the gaveling through of harmful carbon markets on the first day of the conference. This is not only an undemocratic process that threatens the credibility of this conference, it sets the tone for this COP to put Big Polluters’ profits above people’s rights. 

The failure of voluntary carbon markets have shown that carbon markets, offsets, and removals do not work. Instead, they provide a smokescreen for big polluters to keep on emitting at the expense of people and nature. Time and again, these neocolonial schemes have resulted in land grabs, Indigenous Peoples rights and human rights violations, and the undermining of food sovereignty. 

Fully operationalizing carbon markets on the first day of COP29 sends an appalling message to the world for a COP that is set to see the delivery of urgently needed climate finance: Big Polluters and Global North governments may celebrate this as a success, and many will argue that carbon markets can provide the finance needed for a just energy transition, adaptation, and loss and damage in the global South. 

But carbon markets only fill the pockets of Big Polluters, they cannot – and will not – deliver the climate finance needed and owed to developing countries. The gavelling through of this decision on the first day of COP29 sets a dangerous precedent. The documents from the Supervisory Body must go through the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA) for all parties to negotiate on. The rushing through of this decision is undemocratic and undermines the whole process.

Real, proven, community-centered and cost-effective solutions to justly address the climate crisis are increasingly being swept aside in favor of these industry-basked, risky, expensive, and harm-inducing false solutions. Climate justice begins with ending financing for and promotion of false solutions, instead, this COP must deliver the urgently needed climate finance owed to the global South. Bulldozing through Article 6.4 on the first day of the COP without any discussions and opportunity to negotiate by the Parties undermines the CMA, the COP and subverts the entire UNFCCC COP process. 

“Bulldozing through the Carbon Market methodology and text on the first day of the COP without any discussions and opportunity to negotiate by the Parties undermines the CMA, the COP and subverts the entire UNFCCC COP process. The arrival of the carbon market through the backdoor is a bad beginning for this COP, the global south, the Indigenous Peoples, forest and the front line communities. A global mobilization against the carbon markets is the need of the hour now.”

Souparna Lahiri, Senior Climate and Biodiversity Policy Advisor, Global Forest Coalition

“Carbon markets put Indigenous Peoples’ lives at risk. For over 20 years, these fraudulent mechanisms have allowed fossil fuel industries to continue with impunity. At this COP 29, the corporate capture has superseded any semblance of UN democracy with a move from the COP Presidency to go rogue and push through Article 6 carbon market methodology and removals texts without following party-driven procedure. IEN strongly opposes geoengineering technologies in the activities on removals text, which still has not produced a list of what removals technologies will even be included in A6.4 as an offset. We will continue to voice our opposition against Article 6 carbon markets.

Tom Goldtooth, Executive Director of the Indigenous Environmental Network. 

“The gavelling through of carbon markets on the first day of COP29 is unacceptable and undermines the credibility of the whole process. Further, it is opening the floodgates for a global carbon market that will have devastating impacts on communities in the Global South, on Indigenous Peoples, and on small peasant farmers first and foremost. Carbon markets are not climate finance, and we cannot accept these neocolonial schemes to be propped as a success of COP29 in lieu of paying the climate debt owed to the Global South.” 

Lise Masson, Friends of the Earth International

“Carbon markets are not climate finance. They are not the meaningful Real Zero action we desperately need while the world reaches record-breaking temperatures. They are a get-out-of-jail-free card for the world’s Big Polluters and Global North governments. And they condemn people and the planet. For this COP to claim victory, it must reject these false solutions that have been found to be essentially junk time and time again.  It just delivers the Global North’s climate debt and fair share of climate action. And it must defund genocide and finally kick Big Polluters out.” 

Rachel Rose Jackson, Director of Climate Research and Policy, Corporate Accountability.

“This is a bad process and a worse outcome. By trying to ram through loose standards for dangerous carbon crediting mechanisms behind closed doors, the Supervisory Board is handing Big Oil a gift and setting course for climate disaster. Under these sham guidelines, speculative so-called ‘carbon removal’ technologies and ‘carbon capture’ schemes led by oil and gas companies could be counted as carbon offsets – even if they increase climate pollution. Up to 79% of current ‘carbon capture’ operating capacity is just used to produce more fossil fuels, and these guidelines open the door for even more public money for polluting industries. Governments have already spent over USD 25 billion of public money on carbon capture and are planning to spend up to USD 240 billion more, but currently operating carbon capture projects have captured almost no emissions. This dodgy deal shows the Supervisory Board is more interested in looking like they are acting on climate change than actually acting on climate change – UN states should reject it immediately.” 

Myriam Douo, Oil Change International.

“The approval of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement represents a violation of human rights and the original rights of Indigenous peoples. Turning environmental protection and biodiversity into a commodity ignores the sacred value that these beings represent for Indigenous communities. They want to convince us that they can save the planet by selling our forests and the life that lives in them, but this is just another business tactic that only benefits big polluters. Instead of protecting, this policy puts our natural resources at risk and offends the principles of respect and harmony with nature. An approach that truly considers the genuine preservation and dignity of traditional peoples is urgently needed.The real solution for the climate is in the hands of the Indigenous peoples, who have been protecting the earth for millennia with their knowledge and their struggle.” 

Cacique Ninawa Huni Kui, Federation of Huni Kui People of the State of Acre Coordinator – Amazon, Brazil

“It is a very bad signal to open this finance COP by legitimizing carbon markets as a solution to climate change. They’re not – they will increase inequalities, infringe on human rights, and hinder real climate action. In adopting Article 6, the COP presidency is setting the tone for the remainder of the climate talks and confusing ‘climate finance’ with ‘markets’. COP29 is and should remain a finance COP, not a “markets” COP. Countries affected by climate change desperately need real money. The real win for this COP will be in securing 1 trillion a year in grants, not bonds, nor fake offset mechanisms that are a thinly veiled excuse for the world’s biggest polluters to pretend they’re paying their share. Dangerous distractions masquerading as emissions reductions will not suffice. We are here in Baku to demand a new, real climate finance goal, and we won’t accept schemes that only serve to pad the pockets of climate culprits.” 

Ilan Zugman, 350.org Latin America and Caribbean Director

“Carbon markets are not a solution to the climate crisis, and by pushing them through at this COP Indigenous People and those in the Global South are being further condemned by the Global North to suffer catastrophic consequences. At best, it is an insult to the legitimacy of the COP processes, and at worst it is a gift to the fossil fuel industry to continue to pollute unimpeded. Carbon markets are not climate finance, with this agreement in particular riddled with loopholes and false solutions that enable big polluters. This decision is putting the entire aim of the Paris Agreement at risk.” 

Dylan Hamilton, Alliance of Non-Governmental Radical Youth (ANGRY).

“The Africa Make Big Polluters Coalition urgently demands that COP29 unequivocally reject false solutions like carbon markets. These markets are not merely a deceptive substitute for genuine climate finance; they allow polluters to commodify our planet’s future while continuing to pollute our environment. As we gather to confront the climate crisis, we must remember: you can’t buy air from one part of the world to another, and that is precisely what carbon markets represent—another false solution threatening the very existence of our planet.This deception comes at an unbearable cost to thousands of frontline and grassroots communities who have lost their land, livelihoods, families, and lives due to these harmful carbon market projects. We must stand united and demand real, impactful solutions that prioritize the health of our planet and its people. Governments at COP29 must reject carbon markets and commit to meaningful climate action without delay. Big polluters must be held accountable for their undeniable contribution to this climate crisis—the time for action is now!”
Akinbode Oluwafemi, Executive Director , Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa

“Apart from undermining established procedures, a big source of frustration for us is the fact that false ‘solutions’ like removals are still on the table. History tells us that these mechanisms distract from real and lasting emission cuts and have adverse impacts on the rights and livelihoods of communities worldwide. They drive land dispossession, undermine food sovereignty, erode democratic control over resources, privatise global commons, exploit labour, and intensify the most destructive elements of the capitalist system.

We have been very categorical: any mechanism premised on allowing polluters to continue business as usual, to justify fossil fuel use, or to persist in colonising and plundering the global South is not a solution.”

Jax Bongon, IBON International

“For more than two decades of operation, carbon markets have proven to be a completely useless mechanism for reducing emissions, a source of shady business that has only served large emitters to evade their responsibility and deepen the climate crisis by promoting projects that generate impacts and violate the rights of communities.”

Eduardo Giesen, Regional Coordinator DCJ Latin America and the Caribbean. 

“Today, States allowed this rogue move from the Supervisory Body to prevail in the quest to start COP29 with a “win.” But this is hardly a win for people or planet.  Approving this without discussion or debate on this approach, sets a dangerous precedent for the entire negotiation process. This is very concerning from a procedural standpoint: it bypasses States’ ability to even discuss , much less revise the standards before they go into effect. States’ oversight is all the more critical as the Supervisory Body’s efforts to get this done has resulted in risky rules that will lead to human rights violations and environmental harm.  While States won’t be able to undo this move, they can still partially correct the wrong by giving strong guidance to the Supervisory Body that ensures further rules are adopted in line with science, human rights, and international law.”
Erika Lennon, Senior Attorney, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)  

“As the last decades have shown, carbon markets are not only a false solution to the climate crisis but also perpetuate the extractive colonial model of development and human rights violations. The text on removals as it is now, opens the floodgates to very harmful activities like geoengineering which will only worsen the climate crisis and divert attention from real solutions. Today, COP29 has had a very bad start and sets an appalling precedent from a procedural point of view, but above all, it has taken yet another step on the road to climate disaster by backing false solutions and the interest of a few to the detriment of the planet and peoples.”
Coraina de la Plaza, Global Coordinator, Hands Off Mother Earth! (HOME) Alliance

Contact Us

Julian, DCJ, +306941437285, [email protected]