Our constituencies have intensively exchanged with many of you for the past two weeks – We have heard your commitment to land this work in a good, ambitious place. We hope you find more time to engage constructively on this draft. We also would like to convey a message to the presidency: the JTWP needs consensus to be successful, so we would very much like to avoid a take it or leave it approach.
Parties should consider what kind of message that failing to deliver a strong Just Transition decision at this COP will send. It would send a message to workers, people and communities across the world – who are relying on their governments to deliver a bold transformation to a better world – that their governments are, in fact, not willing to see action on this vital issue.
Our priority remains paragraph 8
Our priority is ensuring that paragraph 8 remains in the text as it gives the political signal that we want concrete outcomes out of the Just Transition Work Programme. The compilation of a list of actions that governments should undertake together to advance just transition is a way to ensure progress towards such outcomes.
Ensuring our inclusion in the development of the just transition guidance framework
We support paragraph 9 and would like to propose a pathway for the creation of a just transition guidance framework that ensures the inclusion of stakeholders, starting with the development of the terms of reference (TOR) (e.g. an ad-hoc expert committee as mentioned by LDCs, where observer constituencies are represented, drafts the TOR by SB62)
We want to retain references to social protection and to the informal sector and the care economy. We believe that the inclusion of such language in the final decision text would constitute a big win from this COP. We therefore urge Parties to retain paragraph 18.
Other elements that we like and that should remain/be added in the text
Addition of stakeholders to paragraph 14
Paragraph 14: We welcome the language of social dialogue, however this must also reflect the ILO dimension, meaning that it must include other stakeholders missing in the draft text.
“14. Further highlights the importance of ensuring meaningful and effective social dialogue involving all relevant social partners, including with workers affected by a just transition, informal workers, and stakeholder participation with people in vulnerable situations, Indigenous Peoples, local communities, migrants and internally displaced …”
Retention of important language
Paragraph 13: We appreciate the inclusive approach of paragraph 13 on human rights, Indigenous Peoples rights, labour rights, gender equality.
We emphasise that all the rights mentioned in para 13 need to be kept in the text including right to development and right to a health and clean environment, both agreed internationally.
The emphasis on international cooperation and consideration of the role of social protection, and the importance of the JTWP covering the informal sector and the care economy as essential to a just transition is anotherare is another potential big wins.
Paragraph 18: In addition, we welcome the inclusion of intergenerational equity as one crucial type of justice in paragraph 18.
We want to retain references to social protection and to the informal sector and the care economy. We believe that the inclusion of such language in the final decision text would constitute a big win from this COP. We therefore urge Parties to retain paragraph 18.
We want to retain references to social protection and to the informal sector and the care economy. We believe that the inclusion of such language in the final decision text would constitute a big win from this COP. We therefore urge Parties to retain paragraph 18.
We strongly support those elements and we want to see them retained.
,